|
By Jonathan Amos
BBC News Online science staff
|

The dense, blue ice of the San Rafael Glacier
|
One of South America's leading natural tourist destinations, the San
Rafael Glacier in Chile, is retreating at an alarming rate, say UK
scientists.
"If the glacier retreats further up valley, it will cease to calve
icebergs into the Laguna San Rafael, and one of the reasons why this area
attracts so many tourists will be largely gone."
The San Rafael Glacier is part of the Northern Patagonian Icefield.
It is one of the fastest-moving glaciers in the world, flowing at 17m a
day.
Falling from an altitude near to 3,000m right down to sea level, it is
driven on by gravity and the mass of prodigious quantities of snowfall high
up in the Andes.
Now, Glasser and Aberystwyth colleague Dr Krister Jansson, together with
Dr Stephan Harrison from Oxford University, have been able to show that the
glacier's front wall stands 1km further back in the water compared with the
early 1990s.
Calving activity off the 70m-high vertical ice cliff has been
dramatically reduced, too.
"We first went there 13 years ago.
Tourists visit the site to see icebergs break off
|
"People put paint marks on the rock wall where the glacier was then; they
even built a lookout post directly over the front of the glacier in 92," Dr
Glasser said.
"This year, the glacier is nowhere near this point - it's about a
kilometer back from where it was.
"We've looked at the precipitation records closest to this area and they
show no obvious change over the last 100 years, but they do have a rise in
temperature recorded."
Mirrored recession
Scientists concede their historical data on the extent of glaciers -
across much of the world, not just in South America - is patchy. However,
they argue a consistent pattern of recession is beginning to emerge with
many ice bodies from the Artic to the tropics.
At San Rafael, the glacier's position was recorded once in the late 1800s
as being more than 10km further out into the sea than it is now.
And moraine, the sediments dumped by the glacier, about 12km from the
present ice front are currently being dated by the UK team - but are
expected to be 3,000-5,000 years old.
"So it seems this glacier was relatively stable for 3,000-5,000 years and
then suddenly, in the last 100 years, it came back.
Dr Harrison added: "In recent years, the glaciers of the Northern
Patagonian Icecap have been melting rapidly as a result of global warming,
and the San Rafael Glacier has mirrored this retreat.
"The Patagonian icefields are losing ice more rapidly than any other
comparable ice masses on Earth and we must see this as the inevitable
consequence of global climate change."
Last year, US researchers working in the Patagonian icefields reported
similar concerns. The Nasa-led study, published in the journal Science,
looked at ice loss in 63 areas, comparing data from three decades.
The researchers found ice was lost at a rate sufficient to push up ocean
waters by 0.04mm per year during the period from 1975 through to 2000.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 13, 2003
Our Warming World: Effects of climate
change bode ill for Northwest
By LISA
STIFFLER AND ROBERT McCLURE SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTERS
THE MOUNTAINS
About a dozen snow-moving machines sit behind the Traveler's Rest
convenience store at Snoqualmie Pass, waiting for the winter snowpack that
draws thousands of skiers and snowboarders up Interstate 90 each winter.
| |
 |
| |
 |
Gilbert W. Arias / P-I |
| |
The Paradise
ice caves at Mount Rainier, shown here in 1982, melted away by fall
1991. The Nisqually glacier has drawn back nine-tenths of a mile since
early in the last century. |
Nowadays, though, managers of the Summit at Snoqualmie ski resort are
looking at the sky kind of worried. While the slopes there are the most
convenient to Seattle, they also sit at about 3,200 feet above sea level.
That makes it the lowest Washington ski resort -- the most vulnerable to
global warming.
Scientists already have noted decreases in spring snowpack. With snow
levels likely to rise at the rate of 300 feet for every degree of warming,
a Snoqualmie skiing season that's now four months long on average stands
to shrink to less than three months in 20 years, researchers say. In 40
years, it could be down to two months. Last year's opening, delayed nearly
a month by lack of snow, could be a sign of things to come.
Imagine -- snowless in Snoqualmie.
"We rely 100 percent on natural snow," said Jon Pretty, the Summit at
Snoqualmie marketing manager. "If Mother Nature isn't able to make it
snow, we're de facto out of business."
It's not just snow that's being affected. Ice is, too.
Old advertising slogans touted the North Cascades as "America's Alps."
But the region's glaciers have lost some 30 percent of their girth in the
last century, according to researchers from Nichols College in Dudley,
Mass. They've been monitoring 117 North Cascades glaciers since 1984. All
of them are receding. Seven have disappeared.
A big snow year in 1998-99 helped preserve them, although the dearth of
snow last year again had many shriveling. The only ones that don't seem to
be on the wane are those at high elevations, near the crest of the
mountain range, said Rob Burrows, a geologist at North Cascades National
Park and Recreation Complex.
"I don't think our glaciers are going to disappear in the next 50
years," he said.
Maybe not, but Nichols College's Mauri Pelto, who has been monitoring
them longer than anyone, says most could be gone by then.
Just outside the park lies the continent's best-studied example of
glacier-wasting. Some 25 miles northeast of Darrington, the South Cascade
Glacier has lost a third of its mass in 45 years. The meltoff was
particularly high from the mid-'70s to mid-'90s, reflecting a regional
pattern. And U.S. Geological Survey scientists calculate that the glacier
has probably lost two-thirds of its ice in the last century.
Carved by the hand of nature
By JAMES GELUSO
Shrinking glaciers spell trouble for Skagit River
Lower Curtis Glacier hangs over a lip of rock on the side of
Mount Shuksan, a sheet of ice spilling out of a bowl a few
hundred yards wide. At the bottom of the glacier, cracks have
divided the ice into impressive blue and white towers.
Water - 10 million gallons a day during August - streams out
from under the ice, heading down the side of the mountain into a
summertime creek that eventually settles into Baker Lake below.
On a warm August day, a team of three researchers made a
morning's trek to the glacier. They sat on rocks next to the ice
and attached crampons to their boots so they could walk across
the slick surface.
Just a few years ago, those rocks were covered by glacial ice.
But, like most others in the Cascade Range, the Lower Curtis
Glacier is shrinking.
Mauri Pelto is director of the North Cascades Glacier Climate
Project. He said if Lower Curtis continues shrinking at its
current pace, eventually it will be replaced with a shallow
lake.
This year wasn't a good year for Lower Curtis. "It's already in
negative mass balance now, and there's still two months of
summer left." said Tom Hammond, one of the researchers who
accompanied Pelto in August.
For the past two decades, Pelto has been keeping track of 47
glaciers throughout the North Cascades range, including several
in the Skagit River basin. And they're all shrinking.
If the shrinkage continues, the consequences could be
disastrous.
In some of the Skagit River's sub-basins, glacier runoff
accounts for 40 percent of streamflow in August. Glaciers have
less impact on the Skagit River as seen at Mount Vernon, where
the water from 3,000 square miles passes by. But on rivers like
the Baker, Sauk and Cascade, the rivers would be noticeably
lower.
More important, Pelto said, is the moderating effect of
glaciers. In a dry summer, glacier melt can provide nearly half
of a stream's water. Without that runoff, the fish and wildlife
depending on a stream could be left high and dry.
Some glaciers have already melted off entirely, and more are
heading in that direction. And then, rivers like the Skagit will
run even lower in the summer, leaving those who count on the
water — from residents to farmers to fish — with less.
 |
| Lower Curtis Glacier (center)
spills out of a small basin on the side of Mount
Shuksan. |
Glacial melt is a big part of what keeps rivers in the Northwest
flowing during the summer, when no rain falls and most of the
snow has already melted and run off into the sea. But a
combination of less snowfall in the winter and more melting in
the summer has made the glaciers smaller from year to year.
The prospect of shrinking glaciers alarmed the city of
Bellingham, which depends on the Nooksack River for its drinking
water. The city paid Pelto to study the Deming Glacier, which
feeds the Nooksack, as part of a long-term water supply
forecast.
The trend over the past 20 years has been clear, Pelto said.
There have been more warm years than cool years, and the
glaciers have been shrinking. The glaciers have lost about 20
percent of their total size. They have retreated up the
mountainside, and gotten thinner.
Glaciers grow in the winter. Some of the snow that falls on top
melts and freezes several times over a summer, eventually
becoming firn, the ice that makes glaciers blue. During the
summer, some of the firn melts off and the glacier shrinks.
If the amount of ice that melts off is the same as the amount of
new ice in a year, the glacier will stay the same size — staying
in equilibrium, the glaciologists say. Glaciers often grow in a
cold year, then shrink in a warm year.
"The water will also be less sediment laden and warmer," Pelto
wrote in an academic paper on the effects of glacial shrinkage.
"The impact will be less water for the fall salmon runs, and
less food in amount and processing for stream invertebrates on
which salmon feed downstream in the Sauk and Skagit Rivers."
Pelto conducts his studies of the North Cascades from Nichols
College in Massachusetts. That may not be the best place from
which to study glaciers, but it's where he has his year-round
job as an environmental science professor.
The glaciers are one of the clearest indicators of climate
change. It's often referred to as global warming, and that's
what is happening to the glaciers, but the change is more
complex. One of the predictions of scientists is that the
warming climate will lead to more extreme weather.
For a glimpse of the future, Pelto points to the Lewis Glacier
near Rainy Pass. In 1990, the glacier disappeared entirely, and
the summertime runoff from the basin was just a quarter of what
it had been when the glacier was there.
Not all the glaciers will disappear, Pelto said. A larger,
higher glacier like Easton will keep shrinking for several more
years, but the top of the glacier is high enough that it will
likely still be collecting snow each year. Eventually, it will
reach an equilibrium, smaller than it is now, but not melted
away completely. It's the more plentiful small glaciers that
will disappear, quietly, a few feet every year.
|
Melting glaciers threaten Peru
|
|
Thousands of people in the Andes mountains of Peru are
having their lives affected in both a practical and cultural way by
climate change, which is causing the region's glaciers to melt.
The Andes glaciers are disappearing fast
|
This is already having a major impact of some aspects of life for the
people who live in the mountains - and the government of the country is
worried that the situation could get much worse.
In the last three decades, Peruvian glaciers have lost almost a
quarter of their area.
"This is an indicator which gave us some concern on how the future
was going to be on these tropical glaciers," Patricia Iturregui, head of
the Climate Change Unit of Peru's National Council for the Environment,
told BBC World Service's One Planet programme.
"All our estimations on the basis of this data are that in the next
10 years the top tropical glaciers of Peru - and eventually other Andean
countries - above 5,500 metres will disappear if climate conditions
remain as the last 10 years."
Nasa fears
The most immediate threat is coming from the change to water supplies
in the area. During the dry season, river water comes exclusively from the
glaciers, which melt naturally at that time of year. They then replenish
themselves in the wet season.
But this balance has been upset - the glaciers are melting faster
than they can replenish themselves. As they thaw, dozens of new lakes have spread all over the highland.
"We are in the process of desertification," stressed Ms Iturregui.
"The retreat of the glaciers is definitely going to mean a shortfall
in the water supply in years to come." Conversely, the fact that the glaciers are not replenishing
themselves is also a potential threat to life in the region, as in the
dry season they are the sole source of fresh water.
And there are further impacts on the lives of people in the
mountains.
"Now, glaciers are sliding over the bedrock," said glacier expert
Cecil Portocarrero. "This is causing problems - not only for water resources but also for
tourism, for climbers."
CHACALTAYA GLACIER,
Bolivia (AP) -- Up and down the icy spine of South
America, the glaciers are melting, the white mantle
of the Andes Mountains washing away at an ever
faster rate."Look. You can see. Chacaltaya
has split in two," scientist Edson Ramirez said as
he led a visitor up toward a once-grand ice flow
high in the thin air of the Bolivian cordillera.
In the distance below, beneath drifting clouds,
sprawled 2-mile-high La Paz, a growing city that
survives on the water running off the shoulders of
these treeless peaks.
Chacaltaya, a frozen storehouse of such water,
will be gone in seven to eight years, said Ramirez,
a Bolivian glaciologist, or ice specialist.
"Some small glaciers like this have already
disappeared," he said as melting icicles dripped on
nearby rock, exposed for the first time in
millennia. "In the next 10 years, many more will."
They'll disappear far beyond Bolivia. From Alaska
in the north, to Montana's Glacier National Park, to
the great ice fields of wild Patagonia at this
continent's southern tip, the "rivers of ice" that
have marked landscapes from prehistory are
liquefying, shrinking, retreating.
In east Africa, the storied snows of Mount
Kilimanjaro are vanishing. In the icebound Alps and
Himalayas of Europe and Asia, the change has been
stunning. From South America to south Asia, new
glacial lakes threaten to overflow and drown
villages below.
In the past few years, space satellites have
helped measure the global trend, but scientists such
as Rajendra K. Pachauri, a native of north India,
have long seen what was happening on the ground.
"I know from observation," Pachauri told a
reporter at an international climate conference in
Argentina. "If you go to the Himalayan peaks, the
rate at which the glaciers are retreating is
alarming. And this is not an isolated example. I've
seen photographs of Mount Kilimanjaro 50 years ago
and now. The evidence is visible."
"Ample" evidence indicates that global warming is
causing glaciers to retreat worldwide, reports the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a
U.N.-sponsored network of climate scientists led by
Pachauri.
Global temperatures rose about 1 degree
Fahrenheit (approximately 1/2 degree Celsius) in the
20th century. French glaciologists working with
Ramirez and other scientists at La Paz's San Andres
University estimate that the Bolivian Andes are
warming even faster.
The warming will continue as long as "greenhouse
gases," primarily carbon dioxide from the burning of
fossil fuels, accumulate in the atmosphere, say the
U.N. panel and other authoritative scientific
organizations.
The Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement,
mandates cutbacks in such emissions, but the
reductions are small and the United States, the
biggest emitter, is not a party, arguing that the
mandates will set back the U.S. economy.
As that pact takes effect February 16, the impact
of climate change is already apparent.
An international study concluded in November that
winter temperatures have risen as much as 7 degrees
Fahrenheit (approximately 4 degrees Celsius) over 50
years in the Arctic, where permafrost is thawing and
sea ice is shrinking. Pacific islands are losing
land to encroaching seas, oceans expanding as they
warm and as they receive runoff from the Greenland
ice cap and other sources.
Those sources include at least one gushing new
river of meltwater in western China, where thousands
of Himalayan and other glaciers are shrinking. In
the Italian Alps, 10 percent of the ice melted away
in the European heat wave of 2003 and experts fear
all will be gone in 20 to 30 years.
Such rapid runoff would do more than feed rising
seas. It would end centuries of reliable flows
through populated lands, jeopardizing water supplies
for human consumption, agriculture and electricity.
In Peru, endowed with vast Andean ice caps and
glaciers, 70 percent of the power comes from
hydroelectric dams catching runoff, but officials
fear much of it could be gone within a decade.
Meanwhile, new mountainside lakes are bulging from
the melt, threatening to break their banks and
devastate nearby towns.
Here in impoverished Bolivia, the government has
barely begun to plan for climate change.
Tomas Quisbert, a hydrological engineer with the
water company serving the 2 million people of the La
Paz region, said 95 percent of its supplies come
from the mountains, either rain runoff or glacier
melt. "But we can't say precisely how much comes
from the glaciers," he said.
Ramirez and fellow scientists are seeking
government support to do a complete assessment of
water in the La Paz basin, linked to computer
modeling of future regional climate and its impact.
They'll soon move on from 17,500-foot-high
Chacaltaya ("Cold Road" in the native Aymara
language) as it shrinks toward oblivion. But in 13
years of intense study of the glacier, the
scientists have gathered a rich lode of data
representative of countless small glaciers across
the region.
A rugged hour's drive up from La Paz, with a
simple mountain lodge beside it, Chacaltaya was once
the world's highest ski slope. But no one has skied
down its tongue of snow-coated ice since 1998. The
melt has exposed rock right across its midsection,
splitting the glacier in two.
It covers an area of less than 15 acres, with ice
less than 26 feet thick. Ramirez said it lost
two-thirds of its mass in the 1990s alone, and is
now probably a mere 2 percent the size it once was.
Chacaltaya and other Andean glaciers had been
retreating since the 18th century, when the "Little
Ice Age" ended locally, but the rate has picked up
dramatically in recent decades, melting three times
faster since the 1980s than in the mid-20th century.
Although rising temperatures are an underlying
factor, glaciologists find a complex cycle at work:
A warming Pacific Ocean has created disruptive El
Nino climate periods more frequently and powerfully,
reducing precipitation, including snows to replenish
glaciers. Less snow also means glaciers that are
less white, more gray, absorbing more heat. Newly
exposed rock walls then act like an oven to further
speed melting.
Whatever the regional wrinkles, "it's a global
view," said Lonnie Thompson, one of the world's
foremost glaciologists.
"What we see in the Andes is happening in
Kilimanjaro and in the Himalayas. We've just been in
southeast Alaska, and 1,987 out of 2,000 glaciers
are retreating there," the Ohio State University
scientist said in a telephone interview from
Columbus.
"It's a very compelling story," he said. The
glaciers -- "water towers of the world" -- are the
most visible indicators that we are now in the first
phase of global warming, Thompson said.
|
|
Bolivian glaciers shrinking fast
Huayna Potosi: The cities below depend on the
meltwaters
Glaciers in the Bolivian Andes are shrinking at an alarming rate,
say scientists.
Data collected from tropical ice fields near the world's highest
capital, La Paz, show mass loss in the 1990s at rates 10 times greater
than previous decades.
If rising temperatures and low precipitation continue, many smaller
glaciers will vanish in a decade, the researchers believe.
Further ahead, the consequence could be water and power shortages
for millions of Bolivians.
Dangerous work
Alvaro Soruco led the way across the Zongo glacier, cautiously
poking the ground before him in search of deadly fissures that plummet
deep into the dark heart of this slowly moving mass of ice.
The data are collected weekly
|
To our right, the glacier climbed near vertically to the towering
peak of Huayna Potosi (6,050 metres/19,850 feet).
Lines could be made out on the ice wall - fractures, Alvaro
informed me, which one day would be the starting point of an
avalanche.
All around us on the snow were small insects, blown up in a cloud
from their tropical Amazon home and dropped on to this white carpet to
take their last confused steps. And echoing up from far below came the
distant gurgle of running water.
Data collection
Crossing this glacier is a weekly event for Alvaro, a 22-year-old
student working with the French Institut de Recherche pour le
Developpement (IRD).
From a measuring station located 5,200 m above sea level, he
records data showing precipitation, wind speed, air temperature and
other variables that help the team from the IRD map the changing form
of the glacier.
For a decade now, in fair and foul weather, the team has been
collecting data on this and two other glaciers in the Cordillera Real
mountain range, which curves around La Paz and off north towards Peru.
The results have been alarming.
Losing mass
The Zongo glacier has retreated by around 10 metres and lost about
one metre of depth every year.
Kilimanjaro in Africa: Worldwide, tropical glaciers are on the
retreat
|
The nearby Chalcaltaya glacier, known as the world's highest
ski-field, has lost over 40% of its thickness and surface area.
The key factor accelerating mass loss on these glaciers is
increasingly frequent El Nino events in this part of the world, a
climate phenomenon that may or may not be being pumped up by global
warming.
"This is a problem for the glaciers because it means lower
precipitation and higher temperatures," explained Dr Robert Gallaire,
head of the La Paz IRD unit.
Glaciers are shrinking all over the planet. But tropical glaciers,
most of which are in the Andes, are losing ground fastest.
Tropical glaciers
These low-latitude high-altitude glaciers are particularly
sensitive to changes in climate because their season of accumulation
is summer, when radiation levels are at their peak.
In Europe or elsewhere, glaciers accumulate during the cold season,
allowing some recovery.
In the Andes, the run-off goes on all year, leaving smaller
glaciers, like Chacaltaya, exposed.
"Chacaltaya no longer has enough inertia," said Dr Gallaire. "The
bare rock around the glacier works as an oven, speeding the melting.
Even in 2000/1 when we had a strong La Nina year with a lot of
snowfall, it continued to lose mass."
Important water source
Run-off from glaciers in the Cordillera Real contributes to
reservoirs that supply 1.5 million people in La Paz and the
neighboring city El Alto. It also feeds a series of hydroelectric
plants that satisfy the two cities' energy needs.
If current warming trends continue, Dr Gallaire fears that within
50 years the loss of glaciers will impact heavily on these water
supplies.
.Alaskan glaciers melting faster
The loss is greatest at highest elevations
US scientists have found that glaciers in Alaska are retreating much
faster than originally thought.
The researchers say the resulting melt waters are sufficiently
large to drive up global sea levels by 0.14 millimetres per year.

Over the last five to 10 years there has been an acceleration

|
|
Dr Keith Echelmeyer
|
The study by Dr Keith Echelmeyer, of the University of Alaska
Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and colleagues used laser altimetry
to measure the volume changes of 67 Alaskan glaciers from the
mid-1950s to the-mid 1990s.
Their work, published in the journal Science, adds to the growing
evidence that the level of recent glacier wastage - from polar regions
to the tropics - has been underestimated.
Short of data
"There is some historical evidence that at the turn of the last
century glaciers were thinning but not so that people noticed it
much," Dr Keith Echelmeyer told the BBC.
Malaspina Glacier is losing over 2.7 cubic km of water
per year
|
"What we see over the last 50 years is that they have thinned quite
substantially and then over the last five to 10 years there has been
an acceleration."
Scientists who suspect human activities such as the burning of
fossil fuels are causing an unnatural global temperature rise believe
glacier wastage may be a good indicator of what is happening.
But Dr Echelmeyer is hesitant to say the recent changes his team
have seen are the result of a warmer climate because he feels there is
currently insufficient data to come to firm conclusions.
Greatest loss
"Climate is changing and this is affecting the glaciers - and they
are being a good indicator of that," he said.
"Now, whether it's warming up of the climate or less snowfall, it
is hard to say. That will take further investigation and an analysis
of glacier flow, for example."
Glaciers in Alaska and neighbouring Canada cover 90 thousand square
kilometres, or approximately 13% of the mountain glacier area on
Earth.
Dr Echelmeyer's team surveyed the volume and area changes of part
of this region from an aircraft equipped with a laser altimetry
system. The researchers measured the volume loss by checking glacier
elevation and volume data on US Geological Survey maps from the 1950s.
"Most glaciers have thinned several hundred feet at low elevations
in the last 40 years and about 60 feet at higher elevations," Dr
Echelmeyer said.
Higher levels
The team has calculated that Alaskan glaciers are responsible for
at least 9% of the global sea-level rise during the past century, and
Alaska's glaciers raise the level of Earth's oceans by more than
one-tenth of a millimetre each year.
Warm-up in the Alps
Skiers beware: Melting glaciers mean unpredictable hazards
By BBC News Online's environment correspondent Alex Kirby
If you are contemplating a trip to the Alps, best go sooner rather than
later. The longer you leave it, the less likely you are to find much sign
of the glaciers.
They have drawn generations of climbers and tourists to the Alps from
Europe and beyond. But since 1850, western Europe's glacial area has
shrunk by up to 40%, and the volume by more than 50%.
The melting is happening, and it appears to be gathering pace.
Scientists from Zurich University have monitored two specific regions of
the Swiss Alps, the Engadin and the Simplon, for approaching half a
century.
This year they reported "a pronounced and dramatic shrinkage of both
the extent and number of ice bodies".
"In the Engadin", they said, "24 of the investigated 54 ice patches
have vanished since 1955. In the Simplon area, 10 of 31 ice bodies have
melted away completely since 1967."
Sub-surface melting
Longer-term studies suggest that the Alpine glaciers have been
retreating for the last 150 years, and some scientists believe they could
disappear completely by 2050.
The melt is on across the Alps
|
Satellite studies carried out by the
US Geological Survey's Glims project (Global Land Ice Measurement from
Space) reported evidence in June 2001 of glacier shrinkage in the
Pyrenees, between France and Spain.
The number of Spanish glaciers has fallen from 27 in 1980 to 13 today.
It is not only the glaciers themselves that are warming, but the rock
and soil beneath the surface as well.
Scientists have discovered that Europe's permafrost, the frozen earth
covering mountain areas like the Alps, is melting.
Underground temperatures have risen by nearly a degree in the past
decade - three times faster than at any other time in the last century.
Buildings and villages will be increasingly at risk.
Further afield, the rate of glacier retreat in Russia's Caucasus
mountains is about the same as Switzerland's.
|
|
|
Record Retreat in Swiss Glaciers in
2003 Due to Climate Change: Scientists
|
|
|
| |
|
GENEVA - Switzerland's glaciers melted by
a record amount during 2003 under the onslaught of long-term climate
change, a top Swiss science academy said.
The retreat of the glaciers in the Swiss Alps reached up to 150
metres, with an overall melting exceeding that observed in any year
since measurements began in the 19th century, according to the Swiss
Academy of Natural Sciences.

A view of the Swiss Alps with the peak of the 'Weisshorn' mountain
in the background. The glaciers in the Alps melted by a record
amount in 2003. (AFP/KEYSTONE)
|
And the shrinkage of the mountain ice was not the direct result of
record hot summer temperatures in Switzerland and Europe last year, it
added.
"The overall view that emerges is of a clarity never seen before
since annual measurements started in 1880. None of the glaciers
progressed or were stationary," the academy in Bern said in a statement.
"These observations should not be associated directly with the
extreme summer heat, the length of the glaciers reacts with a delay to
the change in climate," it added.
One of the academy's scientists explained that the overall length of
the glaciers reflected a warming of the climate over several years
rather than immediate shifts in temperature.
More complex measurements of the thickness of the ice cover -- which
is affected by short-term heat -- on three glaciers also showed melting
last year exceeding the levels measured through the 1990s, said Andreas
Bauder.
"The length change sums up all the climatic influences," he told AFP.
"The glacier measurements are one of the best ways of documenting
climate change," Bauder added.
The academy also cautioned that the advance of some glaciers
occasionally observed in recent years was caused by residues of old
snow, and was not due to the freezing of new rainfall during cold
weather.
Overall, glaciers in the heart of Europe's biggest mountain range
stopped advancing about 50 years ago, Bauder pointed out.
The Swiss length measurements were based on regular data recorded on
96 Alpine glaciers.
Climate change has been blamed on global warming caused by the rise
in air pollution from greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.
Bauder said scientists were not able to predict longer term trends
for the ice floes but felt confident enough to forecast that the Swiss
glaciers would again shrink in 2004.
"The glaciers will retreat, just on the signals we had in the last
couple of years," he observed. |
|
|